To coagulate, ligate, or both: a randomized study comparing the safety and efficacy of two endoscopic approaches for managing gastric antral vascular ectasia in cirrhotic patients

Abstract

Background

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is an uncommon but important cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the standard therapy for GAVE. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is an emerging, safe and effective treatment for GAVE. The best way of applying EBL in the management of GAVE is not clear yet.

Aim

We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of APC alternating with EBL versus EBL alone for managing GAVE in cirrhotic patients.

Patients and methods

Forty cirrhotic patients with bleeding GAVE were randomized to receive either APC alternating with EBL (20 patients) or EBL alone (20 patients) until GAVE lesions are eradicated. Gastroscopy was done 6 months after eradication of GAVE lesions to document recurrence. Cessation of bleeding, rise of hemoglobin level, need for transfusion, hospitalization, complications, number of sessions, and recurrence of GAVE in both groups were statistically analyzed.

Results

Patients in both groups showed significantly high rate of bleeding cessation, improvement in hemoglobin levels, reduction in transfusions, and hospitalizations. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the recurrence of GAVE between the two groups. There were no complications seen in the combined therapy group. Twenty percent of the patients in the EBL group had complications including hypertrophied polyp formation and post-band ulcerations.

Conclusion

APC alternating with EBL and EBL alone are effective methods in the treatment of bleeding GAVE. Combined therapy has the potential to decrease the number of banding sessions and the number of rubber bands required to treat GAVE, consequently decreasing the incidence of band-related complications.

Introduction

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is an important cause of gastro-intestinal bleeding (GIB). It is an uncommon cause of overt GIB but it is frequently associated with chronic blood loss and iron deficiency anemia [1]. GAVE is typically seen in distinct patient populations. It can occur in cirrhotic patients and cause non-variceal upper GIB.

The exact prevalence of GAVE cannot be determined due to its relatively silent presentation and association with different systemic diseases [2]. On routine upper endoscopy, GAVE is seen in 3% of patients with advanced liver disease and 2% of those undergoing liver transplantation [3]. GAVE is considered to be responsible for 4% of non-variceal upper GIB in patients with and without portal hypertension [4].

GAVE is a vascular pathological lesion consisting of tortuous and abnormally dilated gastric mucosal capillaries (ectasia) with mural spindle cell proliferation (smooth muscle cells and myofibroblasts), focal thrombosis, and fibrohyalinosis [5]. GAVE is usually diagnosed on upper endoscopy based on the finding of reddish spots arranged either in radial stripes projecting proximally from the pylorus (watermelon stomach) or in a diffuse pattern (honeycomb stomach) or uncommonly nodular pattern (nodular antral gastropathy) [6].

For symptomatic/bleeding GAVE lesions, thermo-ablative endoscopic techniques (argon plasma coagulation (APC)) are considered the gold standard for control of bleeding. APC is widely available and has a relatively lower cost (compared with radiofrequency ablation and laser photocoagulation) as well as good safety profile. It achieves 80 to 100% eradication of the lesions and reduces the need for blood transfusion in 50 to 80% of the patients after 2 to 3 sessions on average [7].

Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is an emerging therapeutic modality for GAVE with a significantly higher rate of control of bleeding with fewer treatment sessions and reduced need for blood transfusion due to greater increase in hemoglobin level post-treatment [8, 9]. While APC effectively obliterates the superficial mucosal lesions, EBL effectively obliterates the submucosal plexus of veins. This is likely to induce a more durable response. The best way of applying EBL as compared to the gold standard APC in the management of GAVE is not clear yet.

This study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of APC (targeting superficial mucosal lesions) alternating with EBL (targeting submucosal angiectasis) versus EBL alone so that the best way of incorporating EBL as an emerging therapeutic modality in the management of GAVE can be elucidated.

Patients and methods

Patient selection and evaluation

This randomized prospective study was carried out on 40 cirrhotic patients after sample size calculation. These patients suffered from overt or occult bleeding from GAVE and attended or were referred to the hepatology and gastroenterology department at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), Giza, Egypt from the period of December 2015 till October 2017. Cirrhosis was diagnosed based on clinical, laboratory or imaging criteria. Overt upper GIB was defined as hematemesis and/or melena. Occult bleeding was defined as bleeding that is not visible to the patient or physician, resulting in either a positive fecal occult blood test, or iron deficiency anemia with or without a positive fecal occult blood test [10]. GAVE was diagnosed based on its characteristic endoscopic appearance. Red spots were almost exclusively limited to the antrum and aggregated either in linear stripes (watermelon stomach) or diffusely spread (honey-comb stomach) without a background mosaic pattern [6]. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant medical conditions commonly associated with GAVE such as: scleroderma, bone marrow transplantation or chronic renal failure. Patients were also excluded if they were on anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy. Patients were randomized using an opaque sealed envelope method into one of two groups:

• Group I (combined therapy group): receiving alternating APC (Fig. 1a) and EBL sessions (Fig. 1b).

• Group II (EBL group): receiving EBL sessions alone.

Fig. 1

a The appearance of gastric antral mucosa after performing APC. b The appearance of gastric antral mucosa after performing EBL

Each group included 20 patients. TBRI’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained (No.: 00010609 date: 16 February 2015) as well as a written informed consent from all the study participants or their proxies. The study was conforming to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines.

All of the following were assessed for all patients during the initial visit:

• Full clinical assessment (history and examination).

• Laboratory investigations including complete blood count (CBC), total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin, and international normalized ratio (INR)

• Abdominal ultrasonography

• Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score

• Upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy

• Treatment strategy (based on randomization after adequate stabilization)

Endoscopic procedures

Standard APC equipment was used, consisting of a high-frequency electrosurgical generator (ICC 200; ERBE, Tübingen, Germany), an automatically regulated argon source (APC 300) and a flexible APC probe. The APC probe was a 2.3 mm Teflon-coated catheter with a heat-resistant ceramic tip, which could be passed through the working channel of the endoscope. Electrical power was 40 to 60 W and argon gas flow was 2 L/min. APC was applied to the lesions beginning at the pylorus and proceeding proximally (Fig. 1a).

EBL was carried out using a pneumoactivate device (Sumitomo Bakelite, Tokyo, Japan) applying ligation bands on the GAVE lesions. Rubber bands were applied to the abnormal distal antral mucosa in circular manner around pylorus. Distance between bands was about 2–3 cm and extending proximally until as much as possible of the abnormal-appearing mucosa is ligated (Fig. 1b). Endoscopic procedures were performed by a single operator.

Sessions were performed every 3 weeks until eradication of GAVE lesions is achieved. Patients in the two groups were re-evaluated in case of recurrence of overt or occult bleeding in between sessions.

Follow-up

Hemoglobin level was evaluated on a monthly basis. Packed red cell transfusion was done when indicated. Upper GI endoscopy was performed in case of overt or occult bleeding and recorded if the source was from GAVE lesions. Follow-up endoscopy was scheduled 6 months after eradication of GAVE lesions to document recurrence. Recurrence of GAVE was defined as endoscopically proven recurrence of GAVE lesions.

Statistical analysis

Post-treatment outcome data were statistically analyzed to compare both treatment approaches as regards the occurrence of bleeding, hemoglobin level, packed red cell transfusion, need for hospitalization, complications, number of treatment sessions, and recurrence of GAVE and subsequently determining the safety and efficacy of both approaches. Results were expressed as means ± standard deviation or in percentage (%) in categorical values. Comparison between the two groups was performed using ANOVA with post hoc least significance difference test. Comparison between categorical data was performed using chi-square test. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to determine significant correlations among different parameters. The data were considered significant if P values were < 0.05 and highly significant if < 0.01. Statistical analysis was performed with the aid of the SPSS computer program (version 20 windows, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Results

Patients’ characteristics and demographics

A total of 40 cirrhotic patients suffering from GAVE who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Twenty patients were randomized to group I who received APC alternating with EBL sessions (combined therapy group), and the other twenty patients were randomized to group II who received EBL sessions (EBL group).

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the clinical features of the disease, mean age, gender, and patients’ residence area. The most common clinical features of the disease in the two groups were: pallor (100% in combined group versus 90% in EBL group), previous treatment for esophageal varices (45% in combined group versus 40% in EBL group), and bleeding tendency (45% in combined group versus 40% in EBL group) (Table 1). The mean age of the patients was 57.75 ± 7.51 in the combined therapy group, and 57.35 ± 8.28 in the EBL group. The female to male ratio was 9:11 in the combined therapy group, and 7: 13 in the EBL group.

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics at baseline (n = 40, 100%)

All recruited patients were cirrhotic. It was hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related in 90% of patients in combined therapy group and 100% in EBL group (Table 1). Forty % of patients in combined group and 40% in EBL group were CTP score class A, 30% of patients in combined group and 20% in EBL group were class B, and 30% of combined group and 35% of the EBL group were class C (Table 1).

Pretreatment endoscopy

Endoscopic picture of GAVE revealed that 17 patients (85%) in the combined therapy group, and 15 patients (75%) in the EBL group had punctate diffuse type of GAVE. On the other hand, classic type of GAVE resembling watermelon appearance was detected in three patients (15%) in combined therapy group, and in five patients (25%) in the EBL group. Varices were detected in a total of nine patients (45%) in the combined therapy group, and in eight patients (40%) in EBL group, with no significant difference between the two groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Ultrasound and endoscopic findings in the two studied groups (n = 40, 100%)

Treatment sessions

Number of treatment sessions was significantly lower in the EBL group than in the combined therapy group (a mean of 3.25 ± 1.07 sessions in combined therapy group, and 1.95 ± 0.76 sessions in EBL group) (P = 0.001). Endoscopic sessions were carried out every 3 weeks until endoscopic evidence of eradication of GAVE lesions was obtained (Table 3).

Table 3 Treatment outcome (n = 40, 100%)

The mean number of banding sessions was 1.5 ± 1.50 and 1.95 ± 0.76 in combined therapy group and EBL group, respectively. The mean number of banding sessions and of the number of rubber bands used was significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the EBL group (P values = 0.034 and 0.042, respectively). The mean number of rubber bands was 8.30 ± 3.53 (range 5–12) in the combined therapy group, and was 11.35 ± 5.44 (range 5–18) in EBL group.

Bleeding cessation rate was similar in both groups with 85% and 90% in combined therapy and EBL groups, respectively (P = 0.676). Recurrence rate was similar in both groups with 15% in combined therapy group and 10% in EBL group (P = 0.676). Hemoglobin levels significantly increased in both groups post-treatment (P = 0.001), with higher hemoglobin values seen in the EBL group. Number of hospitalizations and blood transfusions significantly decreased in both groups (P value = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively) (Table 4). No complications were experienced in the combined therapy group, whereas four patients (20%) in EBL group experienced post treatment complications (hypertrophied polyp formation (Fig. 2a) and post-band ulcerations (Fig. 2b)).

Table 4 Comparison between pre- and post-treatment data in the two groups

Fig. 2

a Post-banding hypertrophied polyp formation seen in the antral mucosa complicating EBL. b Post-banding ulceration seen in the antral mucosa complicating EBL

Discussion

APC is the standard treatment for GAVE. EBL is an emerging, effective and safe therapeutic modality for GAVE. The rationale for use of EBL is linked to its effect on the submucosal vascular plexus while treatment with APC is mainly directed to lesions in the mucosal layer and this may explain why EBL may theoretically be more effective at obliterating GAVE compared to APC with a more durable response [11].

This study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of combining both APC and EBL in alternating sessions with EBL alone. The idea of combining APC and EBL in alternating sessions is to treat lesions in the mucosal layer with APC then to treat the deeper submucosal resistant lesions using EBL. This may help to gain the benefits of both techniques and reduce the side effects associated with the use of EBL by reducing the number of rubber bands used.

In this prospective randomized study, we compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of APC and EBL to EBL alone in 40 cirrhotic patients who suffered from GAVE.

Most of the patients in the two groups showed punctuate (diffuse) type of GAVE which was detected in 17 patients (85%) in the combined therapy group and in 15 patients (75%) in the EBL group. This could be explained by the fact that our patients were cirrhotic and the punctate type is the predominant type of GAVE in cirrhotic patients. This is consistent with previous studies that reported that the punctate type of GAVE is more common in cirrhotics. Punctate type of GAVE was noted in 75% of the patients in the study by Abdelhalim et al., and in 76.5% of the patients in the study by Lecleire et al. [9, 12].

The mean age of cirrhotic patients who presented with GAVE was 57.75 ± 7.51 and 57.35 ± 8.28 in the combined therapy group and EBL group, respectively. This is in agreement with two other similar studies performed on cirrhotic Egyptian patients with a mean age of 54 and 55 years [9, 13]. Other studies reported older age for patients with GAVE [14].

The younger age of GAVE patients may be related to the higher prevalence of liver cirrhosis in this age group secondary to the high prevalence of HCV in Egypt. All recruited patients were cirrhotic. It was HCV-related in 90% of patients in combined therapy group and 100% in EBL group.

Severe anemia was observed in patients of both groups and this was due to either acute or chronic blood loss from GAVE. This is in agreement with Naga et al. and Zulli et al. who stated that cirrhotic patients with GAVE frequently had significant blood loss and anemia often resulting in repeated transfusion [13, 15].

In our study, the mean value of blood transfusion prior to enrollment in the study was 3.90 ± 2.55 and 3.20 ± 2.24 in the combined therapy group and EBL group, respectively. This value was significantly decreased to a mean value of 0.70 ± 1.98 in the combined therapy group and to 0.95 ± 1.88 in the EBL group with P value = 0.001 after six months of follow up denoting that both approaches are highly effective in controlling bleeding from GAVE.

In our study, treatment of GAVE with EBL had required statistically significant fewer treatment sessions as compared to the combined therapy. This may be explained by the fact that EBL is more effective than APC in obliterating the sub-mucosal plexus of veins and this is reflected on the overall efficacy of the procedure and hence the fewer number of treatment sessions. In a meta-analysis by Chalhoub et al., EBL appears to be both safe and effective in the management of GAVE-related blood loss. The limited literature suggests that compared to endoscopic thermal techniques, the use of EBL is associated with significantly lower transfusion requirements and shows a trend towards more encouraging post-procedural hemoglobin changes and lower number of procedures required to obliterate GAVE. Using EBL in the treatment of GAVE has the potential to reduce the healthcare burdens and costs [16].

Furthermore, in our study, the use of APC significantly decreased the number of required banding sessions in the combined therapy group as compared to the EBL group (the mean number of banding sessions was 1.5 ± 1.5 in combined therapy group as compared to 1.9 ± 0.76 in EBL group).

The mean number of rubber bands was significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the EBL group. This may be explained by the fact that APC successfully treats the superficial mucosal lesions and the application of EBL is limited to residual areas which were deeper and refractory to APC.

Patients in both groups showed significantly high rate of bleeding cessation, significant improvement in hemoglobin levels at the end of the follow-up period, and significant reduction in the number of packed red cell transfusions and number of hospitalizations. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the recurrence of GAVE between the two study groups.

Complications of thermal therapies, including APC, in the treatment of GAVE have been reported such as bleeding, perforation, and even death [17]. However, in our study there were no complications seen in the combined therapy group. On the other hand, 20% of the patients in the EBL group had complications including hypertrophied polyp formation and prolonged post-band ulcerations. This was in concordance with previously reported data [18].

Our results showed that the incidence of complications correlated with the number of applied rubber bands which was significantly lower in the combined therapy group than in the EBL group.

Our study has limitations. Small number of recruited patients makes interpretation of results difficult. All the recruited patients were cirrhotic. Whether our results can be extrapolated to GAVE associated with other medical conditions is not clear and needs validation. Larger head-to-head studies comparing APC, EBL, and combined approaches are needed to confirm our results.

Conclusion

Combined therapy (APC alternating with EBL) and EBL alone are effective methods in the treatment of bleeding GAVE in Egyptian cirrhotic patients. Combined therapy has the potential to decrease the number of banding sessions and decrease the number of rubber bands required to treat GAVE, consequently decreasing the incidence of band-related complications. This was at the expense of overall more number of treatment sessions. So, in mild cases when a small number of rubber bands seems to be required, it may be advisable to start with EBL alone, while in severe cases where a large number of rubber bands seems to be required, it may be advisable to use combination therapy of APC alternating with EBL.