Skip to main content

Hepatic cholera: a case report with literature review

Abstract

Background

Vasoactive intestinal peptide-secreting tumors (VIPomas), also known as WDHA syndrome (or “pancreatic cholera”), are rare neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with an incidence of 0.05 to 2%. It secretes excessive amounts of VIP, leading to watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and hypochlorhydria. In adults, they occur most commonly between the ages of 30 and 50 years and are mostly intrapancreatic, occurring in the tail of the pancreas, and rarely located in other segments of the gastrointestinal tract, such as the adrenal glands (35%), paraspinal retroperitoneal ganglia (30–35%), posterior mediastinum (20%), head and neck (1–5%), pelvis (2–3%), and rarely (1%) thymus, lung, kidney, anterior mediastinum, and liver.

Case presentation

Our patient, a 22-year-old man, was admitted with recurrent episodes of large-volume chronic watery diarrhea, generalized muscle weakness, and significant weight loss. After a complete workup, a solitary primary hepatic VIPoma was diagnosed. The patient underwent surgical resection of the liver lesion. Following surgery, there was immediate regression of diarrhea and electrolyte abnormalities, with no recurrence at the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Neuroendocrine tumors, particularly VIPomas, are rare and mostly intrapancreatic. Solitary primary hepatic VIPoma is extremely rare, and to the best of our knowledge, only four cases without any evidence of a pancreatic lesion have been reported. Diagnosis remains challenging, as it is often not detected on conventional imaging. The prognosis mostly depends on tumor grade, stage, and surgical resectability.

Introduction

VIPomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors that secrete excessive amounts of VIP, with an incidence of 0.05–2%. Also referred to as WDHA syndrome (or “pancreatic cholera”), this condition is characterized by watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and achlorhydria. In adults, they occur most commonly between the ages of 30 and 50 years and are primarily intrapancreatic (80–90%), with 42–75% occurring in the tail of the pancreas [1]. In young children (< 10 years old) and rarely in adults (5% of adult cases), they may be extrapancreatic [2]. This report presents a rare case of an isolated hepatic VIPoma without evidence of a pancreatic lesion.

Case report

Our patient, a 22-year-old man with no known systemic illness, was admitted with recurrent episodes of large-volume chronic painless watery diarrhea, small bowel type for the past 2 years, and generalized muscle weakness with significant weight loss (12 kg) in the past 1 year. Further evaluation revealed chronic secretory diarrhea (> 7 L/day) and profound hypokalemia (2.1 mmol/L). He required daily fluid/electrolyte replacement and showed minimal improvement with loperamide. The patient was evaluated for secretory diarrhea. On examination, the patient was afebrile and general and systemic examinations were normal. The CBC and LFTs were normal. Stool culture, leukocyte, hemoccult, ova and parasite, qualitative fat, Clostridioides difficile toxin assays, and cathartic screening were all negative. The colonoscopy and biopsy findings were unremarkable. EGD: Antral gastritis; small bowel biopsies negative; CRP, ESR, IgA tissue transglutaminase, gastrin, calcitonin, ACTH, TSH, and urinary 5-HIAA were all normal. Abdominal ultrasound showed an 8 × 6.1 cm mass lesion in segment five of the liver. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 6.5 × 8.7 cm large well-defined heterogeneous density mass in segment five of the right lobe of the liver with inhomogeneous enhancement on contrast administration. Abdominal MRI (Fig. 1A) revealed a well-defined subcapsular lesion in segment five of the right lobe that appeared hypointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W images with restriction on DWI and with post-contrast enhancement and central non-enhancing cystic areas. AFP level was normal. The plasma VIP level was 834 pg/mL (normal, ≤ 50 pg/mL). PET-CT Gallium-68 Dotatate (Fig. 1B) showed a well-defined, predominantly exophytic mass adjacent to segments IVb and V of the liver, measuring 9 × 8.5 cm, with a prominent, irregular central hypodense non-enhancing focus. The lesion showed fairly homogenous arterial phase enhancement with gradual iso-attenuation with the liver parenchyma in the portal and venous phases. No calcification was observed. No other lesions expressing somatostatin receptors were observed in the remainder of the liver. Our comprehensive evaluation did not reveal any other extrahepatic primary or metastatic lesion. Octreotide therapy was administered, and the patient was scheduled for surgical resection of the lesion. Surgical resection confirmed a bulging subcapsular lesion from the inferior aspect of the liver (Fig. 2). Following surgery, there was an immediate regression of diarrhea and electrolyte abnormalities.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A MRI abdomen showing a well-defined subcapsular lesion in segment five of the right lobe appearing hypointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W images with restriction on DWI and with post-contrast enhancement. B Ga-68 Dotatate PET CT showing a well-defined 9 × 8.5 cm exophytic mass seen adjacent to segments IVb and V of the liver

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Surgical resection confirmed subcapsular lesion bulging from the inferior aspect of the liver. B Resected surgical specimen

Discussion

VIPoma syndrome was first described by Werner and Morrison in 1958 [3]. Most tumors (80–90%) in adults are pancreatic NETs, with 42–75% occurring in the tail of the pancreas [1]. They are mostly large, solitary tumors that are often metastatic at the time of diagnosis [4]. In young children (< 10 years old) and, rarely, in adults (5% of adult cases), they may be extrapancreatic [2]. Extrapancreatic VIPomas can be classified into neurogenic and non-neurogenic types, of which ganglioneuromas, ganglioneuroblastomas, and pheochromocytomas are common [5]. Other extrapancreatic tumors associated with VIPoma syndrome are mostly in the adrenal glands (35%), followed by the paraspinal retroperitoneal ganglia (30–35%), posterior mediastinum (20%), head and neck (1–5% and pelvis (2–3%); rare locations include the thymus, lung, kidney, anterior mediastinum, and liver [2, 6, 7]. The diagnosis requires large-volume secretory diarrhea that persists with fasting and demonstrates elevated plasma VIP levels, with levels greater than 200 pg/mL being almost always diagnostic [8]. Electrolyte abnormalities include hypokalemia, hypochlorhydria, non-anion gap metabolic acidosis, hyperglycemia, and hypercalcemia may also be seen [8]. The diagnosis of VIPoma is mostly delayed and 60–80% are already metastasized by the time of diagnosis [9]. The common sites of metastasis are the liver, lymph nodes, lungs, and kidneys [10]. In most cases, the tumor may be radiologically detected by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, as tumors are mostly > 3 cm in size. MRI has a reported sensitivity of 75–100% and can localize tumors as small as 1 cm in diameter. As 80–90% of patients are somatostatin receptor-positive, Novel imaging with PET-CT Ga-68 Dotatate is 97% sensitive for the detection of VIPomas, while the responsiveness of contrast-enhanced CT and MRI is 80 and 85%, respectively. Octreoscan scintigraphy may be helpful in the identification of hidden metastatic tumor lesions [11, 12]. Intraoperative ultrasonography is useful for detecting obscure neoplasms that are not visible with conventional imaging modalities. Additionally, endoscopic ultrasound may be useful for defining the precise extent and performing a biopsy of the lesion [13]. Immunohistochemically, VIPomas stain positively for VIP, somatostatin, neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and cytokeratin [7]. The World Health Organization classified these tumors according to their mitotic rate and Ki67 index. It includes three grades, G1 means Ki67 less than 3% (low grade), G2 means 3–20% (intermediate); and G3, > 20% (high grade). The poor prognosis of VIPoma is associated with the histological grade, staging, and presence of metastasis [14]. In our patient, Ki67 was 8% positive for synaptophysin positive, CK19 weakly positive, and CK7 negative (Fig. 3). Surgical resection is the gold standard for the management of patients with primary and metastatic VIPoma. Medical treatment is indicated in individuals who are unwilling to undergo surgery or have inoperable metastatic diseases. Octreotide has been shown to control diarrhea, reduce VIP hormone levels, and stabilize VIPoma tumor growth. Inoperable tumors are managed by palliative therapy, including cytoreductive surgery, biologics, and chemotherapy [15]. Novel chemotherapy options such as sunitinib, everolimus, cetuximab, and rituximab have recently been used to treat progressive unresectable tumors [16]. To the best of our knowledge, only four cases without any evidence of a pancreatic lesion have been reported (Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining: A chromogranin A positive, B cytokeratin 7 negative, C cytokeratin 19 positive, D Ki67 8%, E synaptophysin positive, F salt-and-pepper nuclei and stippled chromatin on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain

Table 1 Summary of cases of primary hepatic VIPomas in literature

Conclusion

Overall, VIPomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors that are most commonly found in the pancreas and are usually diagnosed after metastasis. Rarely, tumors may be extrapancreatic in 5% of adults. The diagnosis is generally confirmed by elevated serum VIP levels and functional PET-CT. Treatment is aimed at symptom management and surgery for isolated tumors whenever possible.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

VIPomas:

Vasoactive intestinal peptide-secreting tumors

WDHA syndrome:

Watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and achlorhydria

NETs:

Neuroendocrine tumors

CBC:

Complete blood count

LFTs:

Liver function tests

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

CT:

Computed tomography

PET-CT scan:

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan

ACTH:

Adrenocorticotropic hormone

TSH:

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

5-HIAA:

5-Hydroxy indoleacetic acid

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

References

  1. Ito T, Igarashi H, Jensen RT (2012) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Clinical features, diagnosis and medical treatment: Advances. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 26:737–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2012.12.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Long RG, Bryant MG, Mitchell SJ, Adrian TE, Polak JM, Bloom SR (1981) Clinicopathological study of pancreatic and ganglioneuroblastoma tumours secreting vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (vipomas). Br Med J (Clin Res Ed., 282:1767–1771. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.282.6278.1767

  3. Verner JV, Morrison AB (1958) Islet cell tumor and a syndrome of refractory watery diarrhea and hypokalemia. Am J Med 25:374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(58)90075-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perry RR, Vinik AI (1995) Clinical review 72: diagnosis and management of functioning islet cell tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2273–2278. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.8.7629220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jo JH, Lim S, Han MS et al (2012) VIPoma that arose from the rectum in a 65-year-old male patient. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1385–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1412-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krejs GJ (1987) VIPoma syndrome. Am J Med 82:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90425-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Belei OA, Heredea ER, Boeriu E, Marcovici TM, Cerbu S, Mărginean O, Iacob ER, Iacob D, Motoc AGM, Boia ES (2017) Verner-Morrison syndrome. Literature review. Rom J Morphol Embryol 58(2):371–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schizas D, Mastoraki A, Bagias G, Patras R, Moris D, Lazaridis II, Arkadopoulos N, Felekouras E (2019) Clinicopathological data and treatment modalities for pancreatic vipomas: a systematic review. J B.U.O.N 24(2):415–423

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghaferi AA, Chojnacki KA, Long WD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ (2008) Pancreatic VIPomas: subject review and one institutional experience. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2):382–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0177-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández-Cruz L, Blanco L, Cosa R, Rendón H (2008) Is laparoscopic resection adequate in patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors? World J Surg 32(5):904–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9467-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam S, Liew H, Khor HT, Dalan R, Kon YC, Jong M, Chew DE, Leow MK (2013) VIPoma in a 37-year-old man. Lancet (London, England) 382(9894):832. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61217-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parbhu SK, Adler DG (2016) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: contemporary diagnosis and management. Hosp Pract (1995) 44(3):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2016.1210474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rösch T, Lightdale CJ, Botet JF, Boyce GA, Sivak MV Jr, Yasuda K, Heyder N, Palazzo L, Dancygier H, Schusdziarra V (1992) Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 326(26):1721–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Popa O, Taban SM, Pantea S, Plopeanu AD, Barna RA, Cornianu M, Pascu AA, Dema ALC (2021) The new WHO classification of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor 2 and 5. Exp Ther Med 22(4):1179. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramage, J. K., Ahmed, A., Ardill, J., Bax, N., Breen, D. J., Caplin, M. E., Corrie, P., Davar, J., Davies, A. H., Lewington, V., Meyer, T., Newell-Price, J., Poston, G., Reed, N., Rockall, A., Steward, W., Thakker, R. V., Toubanakis, C., Valle, J., Verbeke, C., … UK and Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (2012). Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). Gut 61(1):6–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300831

  16. Amiri FS (2019) Prevalence of diagnostic methods and treatment modalities in vipoma patients: a rare cause of hormone-mediated diarrhea. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 23(3):318–325. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_105_19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayub A, Zafar M, Abdulkareem A, Ali MA, Lingawi T, Harbi A (1993) Primary hepatic vipoma. Am J Gastroenterol 88(6):958–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah KM, Ma X. (2005) Primary hepatic vipoma presenting as a colonic pseudo-obstruction: 469. Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. ACG 100, S178 https://journals.lww.com/ajg/Fulltext/2005/09001/Primary_Hepatic_Vipoma_Presenting_as_a_Colonic.469.aspx

  19. Haiqing W, Jiayin Y, Jian Y, Lunan Y (2015) Intractable and dramatic diarrhea in liver transplantation recipient with vasoactive intestinal peptide-producing tumor after split liver transplantation: a case report. Transpl Proc 47(1):171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.07.078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dahmani W, Nasr S, Maalel K, Becheikh Y, Tibaoui A, Lajmi Z, Hmissa S, Jaziri H, Elleuch N, Slama AB, Ameur WB, Ksiaa M, Jmaa A. (2023) Recurrent primary hepatic VIPoma treated with a combination of surgical resection and loco-regional therapy. Future Sci OA. Mar 9;9(1):FSO836. https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2022-0046. https://www.future-science.com/doi/10.2144/fsoa-2022-0046

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Gaurav Khatana wrote the article and reviewed the literature. Dr. Lal Krishna Unnikrishnan edited the article. Dr. Sandesh Kolassery revised it for important intellectual content. Dr. Saji Sebastian revised it for important intellectual content. Dr. Sindhu Radha Sadasivan Nair revised the article for important intellectual content. Dr. Ramu M. revised the article for important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Khatana.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Permission to publish was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khatana, G., Unnikrishnan, L.K., Kolassery, S. et al. Hepatic cholera: a case report with literature review. Egypt Liver Journal 14, 53 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00365-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00365-0

Keywords