Skip to main content
  • Original Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Investigating the effect of serum level of uric acid on the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in dialysis patients

Abstract

Introduction

HBV infection is a significant concern in dialysis patients, influenced by various factors. This study aims to investigate the impact of serum uric acid levels on the immunogenicity of hepatitis Bvaccination in dialysis patients.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 125 hemodialysis patients. Prior to dialysis, assessments were made for uric acid, vitamin D, HBsAg, andHBsAb. Patients were divided into two groups based on uric acid levels: high level (≥ 6.5 mg/dl) and low level (< 6.5 mg/dl). Each group received three doses of a high-dose hepatitis B vaccine (40 mcg) at 0, 1, and 6 months. After 8 weeks of the 3rd dose of the vaccine, the anti-hepatitis B antibody titer (HBsAb) was measured and recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.

Results

Among patients with high uric acid, 30 (26.8%) had low HBsAb and 82 (73.2%) had high HBsAb (> 10). In patients with low uric acid, 1 (7.7%) had low HBsAb and 12 (92.3%) had high HBsAb (> 10). There was no statistically significant difference inHBsAb between the two groups. The immune response of HBsAb and uric acid did not show significance based on demographic variables and laboratory results.

Conclusion

This study found no correlation between uric acid levels and the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients. However, it is important to note that the group with low serum uric acid was very small compared to the other group and this may have influenced these results. Further studies with larger patient populations are needed to provide more conclusive evidence in this area.

Introduction

End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is a progressive disease in the world [1]. Global epidemiological studies have reported an increase in the prevalence of ESRD in newly developed countries such as China, India, Brazil, and Iran. [1,2,3]. Among renal replacement therapies (RRT) in patients with ESRD, hemodialysis is a common method [4]. The possibility of HBV transmission through environmental contact between patients and workers of dialysis units has been seen in various studies [5]. One of the possible factors for the continuation of hepatitis B infection in hemodialysis is the presence of latent hepatitis B [6, 7].

Uric acid is the end product of purine breakdown in humans, while other mammals metabolize it to allantoin through uricase [8]. Humans have higher levels of uric acid compared to other mammals due to the absence of uricase [9]. This loss of the uricase gene in human evolution is likely attributed to the strong antioxidant effect of uric acid, which plays a significant role in the body's antioxidant capacity [10]. Uric acid has been found to have a protective effect in neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's [11]. Hyperuricemia is defined as a serum uric acid level exceeding 6.8 mg/dL [12]. However, while uric acid acts as an antioxidant, its antioxidant property can be reversed at higher than normal levels. Studies have shown that the metabolism of micronutrients such as iron, selenium, magnesium, and uric acid affects immune system function, and imbalances in these elements can disrupt defense reactions against diseases or immunization after vaccination [13, 14].

Manuti et al. [15] evaluated the immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in ESRD patients. They found that the seroconversion rate in this population was 63%. Proper control of hemoglobin, calcium, and albumin increased the immunological response, while factors such as old age, gender, and diabetes mellitus had no effect on the rate of seroconversion. Dede Sit et al. [16] also found that adequate dialysis and early vaccination before starting dialysis treatment play a crucial role in increasing the rate of seroconversion. Factors such as old age, male sex, duration of dialysis, and nutritional status were identified as influencing the rate of seroconversion. Mahzouni et al. [17] investigated the status of hepatitis B antibody titer in 133 Hemodialysis Patients and found no significant difference in HBsAb titer based on sex, age, or diabetes status. However, a significant difference was observed between HBsAb titer and history of hepatitis vaccination. Given the importance of HBV infection in ESRD and hemodialysis patients, the variable immune response to hepatitis B vaccination, and the lack of research on the effect of uric acid level on vaccine response in this population, this study aims to investigate the impact of uric acid level on the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

In this descriptive-cross-sectional study, all patients with RRT hemodialysis treatment without a history of hepatitis B vaccination (referred to Shafa, Jayalalita and Saman dialysis centers in Kerman, Iran) from April 2018 to March 2019 were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included a history of liver disease-cirrhosis, a history of viral or medicinal hepatitis, and the use of allopurinol or other drugs that lower uric acid levels. Confounding variables (demographic information, history of diabetes, autoimmune diseases and smoking, history of vaccination, and the duration of dialysis) were recorded. Before dialysis, uric acid, vitamin D, HBsAg and HBsAb check were evaluated. Then, patients were divided into 2 groups based on the level of uric acid: high level ≥ 6.5 mg/dl and low level < 6.5 mg/dl. All patients were vaccinated with a high dose of hepatitis B vaccine (recombinant vaccine, GenHepvax produced by Encyto Pasteur Iran) (40 mcg) three times for 0, 1 and 6 months. After 8 weeks of the 3rd dose of the vaccine, the anti-hepatitis B antibody titer (HBsAb)) was checked. Data analysis was done by SPSS (version 22, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The results were reported descriptively by mean (standard deviation) and frequency (percentage). Independent T test was used to compare the average level of hepatitis B antibody in the two groups (high and low uric acid), and Kaplan–Meier test was used to describe the data related to HBsAb level in the patients. The significance level was considered less than 0.05.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (ethic number:IR.KMU.AH.REC.1398.149). The informed consent was also obtained from all participants in the study. Ethical indices were considered in all stages of the research.

Results

One hundred twenty-five patients without a history of hepatitis B vaccination were enrolled in the study. Among these patients, 60 (48%) were males and 56 (52%) were females. The average age of the patients was 58.52 ± 14.36 years and the patient's weight was 64.59 ± 12.96 kg. In most patients (111 (88%)), high blood pressure was the cause of kidney failure. Five patients (4%) had a history of smoking. In terms of laboratory indices before hepatitis B vaccination, all patients were negative for HBsAg, HBsAb, and HCV Ab (Table 1). Among the examined patients, serum uric acid was more than 6.5 mg/dl in 112 (89.6%), and was less than 6.5 mg/dl in the remaining 13 (10.4%) patients. Results showed that 94 patients (75.2%) had HBsAb more than 10 and 31 patients (24.8%) had HBsAb less than 10. The comparison of laboratory findings between the two groups (those with uric acid above 6.5 mg/dl and those with less than 6.5 mg/dl) was shown in Table 2. According to this table, the mean values of ferritin, vitamin D, Hb, creatinine, cholesterol, and PTH were not significantly different between the two studied groups. however serum albumin, calcium and triglycerides were significanly lower in the group with high serum uric acid. The mean values of dialysis adequacy in the group with high level of uric acid is higher than the group with low level of uric acid. However, this difference was not significant. Comparison of the characteristics of patients (age, sex, place of registration, cause of renal failure, smoking, and weight) between the two groups was summarized in Table 3. The frequency of men was more than women in both groups. The most common cause of renal failure in both groups was related to high blood pressure. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of all mentioned variables. Table 4 indicated the frequency of HBsAb status in the two groups. Based on this table, in patients with high uric acid, 30 (26.8%) had low HBsAb and 82 (73.2%) had high HBsAb. In patients with low uric acid, 1 (7.7%) had low HBsAb and 12 (92.3%) had high HBsAb. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of HBsAb (P = 0.131). The average uric acid (4.46 ± 1) in patients with low HBsAb was less than its level in patients with high HBsAb (4.79 ± 1.35). This difference was not statistically significant (p.v = 0.213). The comparison of laboratory findings based on HBsAb level (less than 10 and more than 10) was shown in Table 5. This table showed that the mean values of all the studied parameters were not significantly different in patients with low compared to those with high HBsAb levels. The mean values of Hb and TG in the group with low HBsAb were insignificantly higher compared to the group with high HBsAb. The characteristics of patients (age, sex, place of registration, cause of renal failure, smoking, and weight) were also compared between patients with low and high HBsAb levels (Table 6). According to this table, there were no sttistically significant differences of gender, average age, or weight, cause of renal failure, or smoking between patients with high compared to those with low HBsAb levels ( P > 0.05). Uric acid was < 3.5 mg/dl in 38 (30.4%), was between 3.5–6.5 mg/dl in74 (59.2%), and was more than 6.5 mg/dl in 13 (10.4%).Using Pearson's test, it was found that there is no relationship between uric acid and HBsAb (P = 0.857) (Table 7).

Table 1 Demographic variables in the evaluated patients
Table 2 Comparison of average laboratory findings in the two groups, uric acid ≥ 6.5 and uric acid < 6.5 mg /dl
Table 3 Comparison of the characteristics of patients (age, sex, place of registration, cause of renal failure, smoking, and weight) in the two groups, uric acid ≥ 6.5 mg/dl and uric acid < 6.5 mg/dl
Table 4 Comparison of the rate of seroconversion after HBV vaccine in the two groups of patients with uric acid > 6.5 and those with uric acid < 6.5 mg/dl
Table 5 Comparison of laboratory findings based on HBsAb level (> 10 and ≤ 10)
Table 6 Comparison of the characteristics of patients (age, sex, place of registration, cause of of renal failure, smoking, and weight) based on HBsAb level (> 10 and ≤ 10)
Table 7 Correlation coefficient of uric acid and HBsAb

Discussion

The effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccine in patients undergoing hemodialysis is less than in healthy individuals. The main reason for this issue is the decrease in the immunity level of these patients and the gradual decrease of HBsAb. This effectiveness is variable in a wide range between 50 and 80% of the normal rate and this variable rate of response to the vaccine depends on factors related to immunization and factors related to the host.seroconversion and adequate resonse are defined as Anti-HBs > 10 IU/L, and > 100 IU/L, respectively. also the antibody titer < 10 IU/L is defined as hyporesponsive [16]. Our study showed that 24.8% of hemodialysis patients were hyporesponsive against hepatitis B virus vaccine and their antibody titer is less than 10 IU/L.These date seems relatively high and and are comparable with other studies as, Mahzouni et al., who found that 29.32% of evaluated patients were hyporesponsive against hepatitis B virus vaccine [17]. However, Ebrahim et al., in Egypt assessed the antibody level after hepatitis B vaccination in dialysis patients. This group showed that 6.9% of patients had a titer of less than 10 [18]. The difference between Ebrahim et al. and our study can be related to the sample size, the number of examined patients and also to the timming of the assessment. Ebrahim et al., evaluated the paients response after the 4th dose of the vaccine, however we only gave the patients 3 doses of the vaccine. Most of the similar studies also showed that gender was not an effective factor in the amount of antibody titer, which are comparable with our results, where there were no differences between males and females or between patients according to their ages and their HBsAb titer. Asghari et al. showed that gender has no significant relationship with antibody titer status and immunity level of individuals [19]. However, some studies showed difference in HBsAb between men and women. Kazemini et al., reported a higher titer among women compared to men. [20]. In another study, a better response to hepatitis B vaccination was reported in young and male individuals [16]. Meanwhile, some studies showed that age was an effective factor in antibody titer. Yang et al. concluded that the rate of response to the vaccine decreases with increasing age (more than 40 years) [21]. Baba Mahmoudi et al. also showed that old age and the frequency of vaccine injections have a significant effect on the rate of response to it, and Hbs antibody titers decrease over time [22]. Asghari et al. also concluded that age was effective in the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine, and the immunogenicity decreases with increasing age [19]. Alavian et al. investigated the effect of diabetes on the immunity of the hepatitis B vaccine and concluded that diabetics had a significant decrease in response compared to non-diabetics [23]. These different results can be explained by differences in the studied groups,, residential area, health level, diet of different communities and people’s level of awareness. Diabetic people are always exposed to infectious diseases and should have regular vaccinations. The immunity level of diabetic patients is at the level of healthy people, and if diabetes is controlled, diuresis is normal, and they do not suffer from ketonuria, they show a suitable response to many vaccines [24],our results also showed no differences of HBsAb titer between patients with various etiologies ( diabetes or others).In patients with high level of uric acid, 30 (26.8%) had low HBsAb level and 82 (73.2%) had high HBsAb level. In patients with low level of uric acid, 1 (7.7%) had low HBsAb and 12 (92.3%) had high HBsAb level. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of HBsAb. A study showed that uric acid can strongly enhance T-cell immune responses induced by HBsAg-pulsed-DCs vaccine. Uric acid may act as an effective adjuvant of dendrocyte-containing vaccine against HBV infection [25]. In our study, laboratory findings (ferritin, vitamin D, hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum calcium, dialysis adequacy, creatinine, triglyceride, cholesterol, PTH) were not related to HBsAb. In Magellan et al.’s study, it was found that a higher serum zinc level reduces the risk of non-response to hepatitis B vaccination, and male gender was associated with an increased risk of not producing antibodies against hepatitis B [26]. In some studies, malnutrition, uremia, and generalized immunosuppression in dialysis patients have been reported among the possible contributing factors to the lack of proper response to hepatitis B vaccination [27]. However, in our study, the low level of serum albumin, as a sign of malnutrition in dialysis patients, was not related to the response to hepatitis B vaccination. Manuti et al. showed the seroconversion rate with percentage of 63%. This group indicated that the proper control of hemoglobin, calcium and albumin and the passage of longer time from hemodialysis can significantly increase the immunological response to this vaccine. Old age, gender and diabetes mellitus had no effect on the rate of seroconversion [15]. The advantage of our study was to investigate the level of uric acid, which has not been investigated in response to hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients. One of the limitations of our study was the small sample size of the group of patients with low serum uric acid. Therefore, studies including suffcient number of patients with chronic kiney failure before and during dialysis may be more informative.

Conclusion

In our study, there was no correlation between uric acid level and immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients. More studies on a larger number of patients are necessary in this field.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Amouzegar A, Abu-Alfa AK, Alrukhaimi MN et al (2021) International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas: structures, organization, and services for the management of kidney failure in the Middle East. Kidney Int Suppl (2011) 11(2):e47–e56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kisu.2021.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouya S, Balouchi A, Rafiemanesh H, Hesaraki M (2018) Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Iranian general population: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ther Apher Dial 22(6):594–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.12716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma S, Sarnak MJ (2017) Epidemiology: the global burden of reduced GFR: ESRD, CVD and mortality. Nat Rev Nephrol 13(8):447–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2017.84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang C, Lv LS, Huang H et al (2017) Initiation time of renal replacement therapy on patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8179 participants. Nephrology (Carlton) 22(1):7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Messa P, Martin P (2015) Transmission of hepatitis B virus in dialysis units: a systematic review of reports on outbreaks. Int J Artif Organs 38(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hou J, Liu Z, Gu F (2005) Epidemiology and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection. Int J Med Sci 2(1):50–57. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.2.50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sayan M, Dogan C (2012) Genotype/subgenotype distribution of hepatitis B virus among hemodialysis patients with chronical hepatitis B. Ann Hepatol 11(6):849–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh Y-P, Chang C-C, Kor C-T et al (2017) Relationship between uric acid and technique failure in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a long-term observational cohort study. BMJ Open 7:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi Y (2010) Caught red-handed: uric acid is an agent of inflammation. J Clin Invest 120(6):1809–1811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim HE, Kim SH, Kim EJ, Kim JW, Rha SW (2010) Clinical value of serum uric acid in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Korean J Intern Med 25(1):21–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Qiao M, Chen C, Liang Y, Luo Y, Wu W (2021) The influence of serum uric acid level on Alzheimer’s disease: a narrative review. Biomed Res Int 2021:5525710. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5525710. Published 2021 Jun 2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Grassi D, Ferri L, Desideri G et al (2013) Chronic hyperuricemia, uric acid deposit and cardiovascular risk. Curr Pharm Des 19(13):2432–2438. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612811319130011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gombart AF, Pierre A, Maggini S (2020) A review of micronutrients and the immune system-working in harmony to reduce the risk of infection. Nutrients 12(1):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010236. Published 2020 Jan 16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Morales F, Montserrat-de la Paz S, Leon MJ, Rivero-Pino F (2024) Effects of malnutrition on the immune system and infection and the role of nutritional strategies regarding improvements in children’s health status: a literature review. Nutrients 16(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Manuti JK (2016) Immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in end stage renal diseases. Iraqi J Med Sci 14(1):62–66

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sit D, Esen B, Atay AE, Kayabaşı H (2015) Is hemodialysis a reason for unresponsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine? Hepatitis B virus and dialysis therapy. World J Hepatol 7(5):761–768. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i5.761

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahzooni N, Moradi M, SHaikh Ahmadi K (2017) Investigation of HbsAb in hemodialysis patients and related factors in Bane and Saqez cities in 2014. Zanko J Med Sci 17(55):46–54. URL: http://zanko.muk.ac.ir/article-1-160-en.html

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim S, el-Din S, Bazzal I (2006) Antibody level after hepatitis-B vaccination in hemodialysis patients: impact of dialysis adequacy, chronic inflammation, local endemicity and nutritional status. J Natl Med Assoc 98(12):1953–1957

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. AsghariEstiar M, Moaddab R, Esmaeelnasab N, Rafi A (2014) Immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine among medical staff of Shahid Madani hospital of Tabriz. Iran J Fasa Univ Med Sci 4(2):154–160

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kazemeini SK, Owila F (2013) Determination of HBS antibody titre in vaccinated health care workers of Shahid Sadoughi burn hospital in Yazd in 2011. Toloo e Behdasht 12(1):155–163

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang S, Tian G, Cui Y et al (2016) Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Sci Rep 6:27251. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27251. Published 2016 Jun 21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Baba MF (2000) Evaluation of Hepatitis B Antibody (HBS) levels in nursing staff of Gaemshahr Razi Hospital and it’s variation with duration of immunity post HB vaccination. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 10(27):48–53

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alavian SM, Tabatabaei SV (2010) The effect of diabetes mellitus on immunological response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of current literature. Vaccine 28(22):3773–3777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Silvestri F, Tromba V, Mazzotta I, Costantino F (2023) How does diabetes type 1 affect immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in pediatric population? Evaluation of a booster dose in unresponsive subjects with type 1 diabetes. Minerva Pediatr 5(6):822–827. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.19.05678-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma XJ, Tian DY, Xu D et al (2007) Uric acid enhances T cell immune responses to hepatitis B surface antigen-pulsed-dendritic cells in mice. World J Gastroenterol 13(7):1060–1066. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i7.1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Majelan NN (2007) Investigation of the relationship between serum zinc and humoral immune response to vaccination hepatitis B in dialysis patients. J Yazd Med Univ 1:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sezer S, Ozdemir FN, Guz G, Arat Z, Colak T, Sengul S et al (2000) Factor influencing response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in hemodialysis patients. Transpl Proc 32:607–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We, the authors, thank the staff and patients of the Kerman University of Medical Sciences dialysis wards. Special thanks to MS Rajaii for cooperating in entering the data in SPSS.

Funding

The Kerman University of Medical Sciences funded this study. The data in this article were taken from the thesis of Dr Nasibe Golestani at the Kerman University of Medical Sciences. (Grant No. IR.KMU.REC Reg. No. 98000456.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the study; Najmeh Shamspour, Nasibe Golestani. Generation, collection, assembly, analysis and/or interpretation of data; Najmeh Shamspour, Nasibe Golestani, Jalal Azmandian, Habibeh Ahmadipour. Drafting and/or revision of the manuscript; Najmeh Shamspour, Nasibe Golestani. Approval of the final version of the manuscript. Najmeh Shamspour, Jalal Azmandian.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najmeh Shamspour.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Data collection forms were anonymous and fiduciary, confidential, and non-disclosure of participants' secrets. Ethical consents were obtained from all patients. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (ethic number:IR.KMU.AH.REC.1398.149).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There was no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golestani, N., Shamspour, N., Azmandian, J. et al. Investigating the effect of serum level of uric acid on the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in dialysis patients. Egypt Liver Journal 14, 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00328-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00328-5

Keywords