Skip to main content
Egyptian Liver Journal
Download PDF

Potential relation between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and glycemic and metabolic parameters in subjects without diabetes

Egyptian Liver Journal volume 11, Article number: 85 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is proved to be related to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, and it is also not rare in individuals without diabetes. The present study attempts to identify the metabolic risk factors of NAFLD among those individuals.

Results

ALT and HbA1c levels were independently associated with NAFLD development in individuals without diabetes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified the optimal cutoff point of ALT (> 19 IU/ml) with AUC = 0.731, 95% CI 0.653–0.809. On the other hand, the optimal cutoff point of HbA1c was identified to be > 5.1% with AUC = 0.665, 95% CI 0.581–0.750.

Conclusions

Early identification of NAFLD among subjects without diabetes is crucial. In this study, ALT and HbA1c cutoff values had been identified, so we suggest that inclusion of both HbA1c and ALT levels may have significant implications for prediction of NAFLD among individuals without diabetes.

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) became a major epidemiological burden worldwide with a predictable global occurrence of 20–30% [1]. It includes a considerable variety of illnesses ranging from hepatic inflammation to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and/or liver cancer. Moreover, NAFLD is at present the most common cause of elevated liver enzymes [2]. The association between NAFLD, diabetes, and obesity owing to insulin resistance (IR) has been well proven [3, 4]. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is one of the advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), resulting from non-enzymatic glycation of hemoglobin. The level of HbA1c reflects the duration and severity of hyperglycemia in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals [5]. Although earlier studies showed a link between HbA1c level and the prevalence of NAFLD [6, 7], their relationship is not yet well-established especially among individuals without diabetes. Dyslipidemia is a well-known influence factor of NAFLD [8, 9]. It has been reported in 20 to 80% of NAFLD cases [10]. Recent study showed the link between NAFLD and premature cardiovascular disease through atherogenic dyslipidemia which comes from IR [11]. Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein ratio (TG/HDL-C) has been validated as a predictive indicator for IR, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension [12,13,14]. TG/HDL-C is supposed to be associated with incident NAFLD [15]. To the best of our knowledge, studies focusing specifically on NAFLD among individuals without diabetes in the general population are limited [7, 16, 17]. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate their unique metabolic characteristics and to reveal the independent factors associated with NAFLD among those individuals.

Methods

Study design and participant’s selection

This is a case control study included 178 participants without diabetes recruited from Hepatology outpatient clinic in Alexandria Main University Hospital. We excluded patients with alcohol consumption, viral, autoimmune, neoplastic, or hereditary liver diseases, thyrotoxicosis or hypothyroidism, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration ≥ 126 mg/dl or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, and hemoglobin less than 12 g/dl.

Sample size

Sample size was calculated based on previous literature [18]; an expected difference of average HbA1c between NAFLD and the control group is 0.2, and the standard deviation is 0.3. Using the level of confidence of 95% (alpha = 0.05) and power of 90 (beta = 0.10) and allocation of 1:2, the minimal sample size required to reject the null hypothesis is 50 in the NAFLD group and 100 in the control group. We targeted 53 participants with NAFLD and 125 age and sex matched control subjects to compensate the missing data.

Clinical and biochemical data

All participants were subjected to clinical examination including blood pressure, weight (Wt), standing height (Ht), and waist circumference (WC) measurements. WC was measured according to the WHO recommendation at the end of normal expiration from the midpoint between highest point of the iliac crest and lowest point of the costal margin. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body Wt (kg) divided by body Ht squared (m2). Overnight fasting blood samples were obtained from the antecubital vein for complete blood count, ALT, AST, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), fasting insulin, plasma glucose, and HbA1c analysis. TG/HDL-C ratio was calculated by dividing serum TG level by serum HDL-C level. The Homeostasis Model Assessment 2 (HOMA2) calculator was used to estimate insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) according to the updated computer based HOMA2 mode [19].

Abdominal ultrasound examination

Abdominal ultrasonography was carried out by an expert radiologist. NAFLD was defined by the presence of at least two of four sonographic criteria: diffuse hyper-echoic echo-texture (bright liver), increased echo-texture compared with the kidneys, vascular blurring, and deep attenuation [20].

Ethical statement

The study was performed in alignment with revised Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Our study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University (IRB No. 0304901). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.

Statistical analysis

Analysis was done using SPSS 20.0. Chi-square test was used to compare between groups for categorical variables. Student t test was used to compare two groups for normally distributed quantitative variables, while Mann-Whitney test was used to compare between two groups for not normally distributed quantitative variables. Logistic regression (univariate and multivariate) was used to analyze factors associated with NAFLD. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) is plotted to predict the role of HbA1c in identifying NAFLD among subjects without diabetes. It showed the performance of the cutoff point in terms of sensitivity versus 1-specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) is an estimate of the accurateness of cutoff point. Area more than 50% gives acceptable performance. P value less than 5% level is considered significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of participants are shown in Table 1. The NAFLD group has significantly higher BMI, WC, HbA1c, ALT, and GGT than the control group. Regarding lipid profile, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TG/HDL-C ratio were significantly higher in NAFLD group than the control group (Table 1). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for NAFLD in subjects without diabetes. Eighteen variables were included into the analysis (Table 2). Our results showed that HOMA-IR, ALT, BMI, HbA1c, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and TG/HDL-C ratio were significantly associated with the risk of NAFLD. Upon them, ALT and HbA1c levels were independently associated with NAFLD development after performing the multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was plotted to study the ability of ALT level and HbA1c level for discrimination between those with and without NAFLD among non-diabetic individuals. The analysis identified the optimal cutoff point of ALT to be > 19 IU/ml. The corresponding sensitivity was 73.58%, specificity was 60.80%, and area under the curve was 0.731 (95% CI 0.653–0.809) (Fig. 1). On the other hand, the optimal cutoff point of HbA1c was identified to be > 5.1% with corresponding sensitivity and specificity being 79.25% and 41.60%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.665 (95% CI 0.581–0.750) (Fig. 2).

Table 1 Comparison between the two studied groups according to different parameters
Full size table
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for the parameters affecting the NAFLD group
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curve for ALT to diagnose NAFLD patients (n = 53 vs. 125). Cutoff value 19 IU/L, sensitivity 73.58%, specificity 60.80%, and area under the curve 0.731 (95% CI 0.653–0.809)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve for HbA1c to diagnose NAFLD patients (n = 53 vs. 125). Cutoff point > 5.1%, sensitivity 79.25%, specificity 41.60%, and area under the curve 0.665 (95% CI 0.581–0.750)

Full size image

Discussion

Due to the high occurrence and important medical consequences of NAFLD, early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for termination of progression and even reversal of the disease [21]. Most NAFLD patients are asymptomatic and usually identified when abnormal liver studies particularly liver enzymes are noted. However, these enzymes may not be elevated in all NAFLD cases [22]. The present study showed that ALT is significantly higher in NAFLD patients than non NAFLD. In addition, our study revealed that the cutoff point of ALT > 19 IU/ml can independently predict NAFLD development among individuals without diabetes. Similarly, Wong et al. [23] revealed that raising liver enzyme levels, chiefly ALT, may predict incident diabetes and NAFLD. Similar observations were also obtained by a study among Montenegrin population, found that ALT was independent predictor for NAFLD but with a higher cutoff point of 22 IU/L [24]. These results are also consistent with that of Al Humayed et al. [25] who identified that ALT is a predictor for NAFLD with a threshold cutoff value of 22.1 nmol/L. Our lower ALT cutoff point might be explained by that the present study was done among individuals without diabetes while the participants of other studies had diabetes.

HbA1c and HOMA-IR are considered screening tools for insulin resistance [26]. The relationship between NAFLD and insulin resistance is obscure. Previous studies declared that insulin resistance is a well-established driver for NAFLD [27, 28], while another study showed that presence of NAFLD is an important marker of multi-organ insulin resistance [29]. The present study revealed that HbA1c level was independently associated with NAFLD in individuals without diabetes. These results are consistent with that of Chen et al. [7] who confirmed an association between the levels of HbA1c and NAFLD in metabolically intact patients with HbA1c levels of 5.6% or less. Similar results were obtained by Masroor et al. [16]. Independent association of NAFLD with HbA1c was also observed by Sharma et al. [17] who showed hepatic gluconeogenesis derangement in non-diabetic and non-obese subjects with NAFLD. Moreover, hemoglobin glycation index showed its ability to identify the non-diabetic individuals at risk of developing NAFLD [30]. In addition, our study showed that insulin resistance assessed by HOMA-IR is significantly positively correlated with NAFLD. These results go hand in hand with the findings of Bae et al. [31]. The question about whether or not glycemic derangement is a spectator, a cause, or a consequence of NAFLD is still unsettled. This relationship might be explained by one of the following two mechanisms. The first one is that it impaired hepatic lipid settling and increased oxidative stress in liver cells, played a crucial role in the hepatic insulin signaling, impaired insulin inhibition of hepatic glucose production, and affected insulin sensitivity in muscle and adipose tissue resulting in insulin resistance [32]. The other possible mechanism is that the insulin resistance plays an important role in NAFLD pathogenesis by allowing storage of free fatty acids in the liver [33]. Recent study showed that the activation of receptor for advanced glycation end products pathway (AGEs/RAGE) triggers further inflammation and oxidative stress and impairs insulin signaling and thus provokes the development and progression of NAFLD [34].

Obesity represents an essential risk factor for NAFLD development and progression, and weight loss can improve lipid metabolism in the liver [35]. Our study showed that high BMI is significantly associated with NAFLD. These results go hand in hand with the findings of Masroor et al. [16]. These findings can be also explained by that obesity may lead to an imbalanced production of pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines, which contributes to NAFLD development. The other justification is that obesity is usually associated with insulin resistance and increase in HbA1c [36].

Deranged carbohydrate metabolism affects lipid metabolism and results in increased production of TG that deposits in various tissues including liver leading to fatty liver [37]. One of main features of NAFLD is dyslipidemia including increased TG, increased LDL-C, and decreased HDL-C [38].

In agreement with the results of the present study, Fukuda et al. [39] found a significant positive correlation between TG/HDL-C ratio and NAFLD, but on the other hand, Fukuda et al. [39] and Fan et al. [15], in discordance with the results of the current study, reported that TG/HDL-C ratio was an independent predictor of NAFLD. This difference could be attributed to the difference in study population and the small sample size of the current study compared to the other studies.

Though the relationship between TG/HDL-C and NAFLD has not been fully decoded, insulin resistance is a potential mediator. Compared with other lipid parameters, TG/HDL-C was declared to be strongly correlated with insulin resistance [40]. Experimentally, insulin resistance was shown to increase the secretion of TG over-enriched VLDL particles and decrease the level of HDL-C [41]. In conclusion, our results showed that serum ALT and HbA1c levels were independently associated with NAFLD in individuals without diabetes and may be used as surrogates for NAFLD in this cohort.

Conclusions

Our study had some limitations that should be taken into account. First, the diagnosis of NAFLD was performed by ultrasonography. Although ultrasonography is non-invasive, reasonably accurate, and widely used in clinical practice and epidemiological studies of NAFLD, it is not sensitive enough to identify mild steatosis. Second, the detection of the degree of steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD patients by fibroscan is highly recommended nowadays. Unfortunately, it was not performed in the current study since it is expensive, needs special experts, and is not available in our institute. Third, there were no follow-up to confirm the results. Despite these study limitations, our study was unique in describing the predictors connected to NAFLD among individuals without diabetes in Alexandria, Egypt. Furthermore, this study highlights that the inclusion of both HbA1c and ALT levels may have significant clinical implications for prediction of NAFLD in individuals without diabetes. Thus, we suggest that individuals without diabetes with ALT values of > 19 IU/ml and HbA1c > 5.1% should be referred for ultrasound examination for the possibility of NAFLD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during current study are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

IR:

Insulin resistance

HbA1c:

Glycosylated hemoglobin

AGEs:

Advanced glycation end-products

TG/HDL-C:

Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein ratio

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

Wt:

Weight

Ht:

Height

WC:

Waist circumference

BMI:

Body mass index

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

HDL-C :

High-density lipoprotein

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein

HOMA:

Homeostasis Model Assessment

GGT:

Gamma-glutamyltransferase

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

VLDL:

Very low-density lipoprotein

References

  1. Marchesini G, Day CP, Dufour JF et al (2016) EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 64(6):1388–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHEP.2015.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM (2011) Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 34(3):274–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2036.2011.04724.X

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE et al (2018) The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 67(1):328–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEP.29367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Association AD (2020) 4. Comprehensive medical evaluation and assessment of comorbidities: standards of medical care in diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 43(Supplement 1):S37–S47. https://doi.org/10.2337/DC20-S004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chamberlain JJ, Rhinehart AS, Shaefer CF, Neuman A (2016) Diagnosis and management of diabetes: synopsis of the 2016 American diabetes association standards of medical care in diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 164(8):542–552. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-3016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka K, Takahashi H, Hyogo H et al (2019) Epidemiological survey of hemoglobin A1c and liver fibrosis in a general population with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Res. 49(3):296–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/HEPR.13282

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen C, Zhu Z, Mao Y et al (2020) HbA1c may contribute to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease even at normal-range levels. Biosci Rep. 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20193996

  8. Yang SH, Du Y, Li XL et al (2017) Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and cardiovascular events in diabetics with coronary artery disease. Am J Med Sci. 354(2):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJMS.2017.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu L, Parhofer KG (2014) Diabetic dyslipidemia. Metabolism. 63(12):1469–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.METABOL.2014.08.010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MR de A S, M de FF de M D, de JEM M-F, de MST A (2012) Metabolic syndrome and risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Arq Gastroenterol. 49(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032012000100015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akhtar DH, Iqbal U, Vazquez-Montesino LM, Dennis BB, Ahmed A (2019) Pathogenesis of insulin resistance and atherogenic dyslipidemia in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 7(4):362–370. https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2019.00028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Murguía-Romero M, Jiménez-Flores JR, Sigrist-Flores SC et al (2013) Plasma triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio, insulin resistance, and cardiometabolic risk in young adults. J Lipid Res. 54(10):2795–2799. https://doi.org/10.1194/JLR.M040584

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Turak O, Afşar B, Ozcan F et al (2016) The role of plasma triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio to predict new cardiovascular events in essential hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens. 18(8):772–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCH.12758

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Onat A, Can G, Kaya H, Hergenç G (2010) “Atherogenic index of plasma” (log10 triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein−cholesterol) predicts high blood pressure, diabetes, and vascular events. J Clin Lipidol. 4(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACL.2010.02.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fan N, Peng L, Xia Z et al (2019) Triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as a surrogate for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study. Lipids Heal Dis 181(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12944-019-0986-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masroor M, Haque Z (2021) HbA1C as a biomarker of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: comparison with anthropometric parameters. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 9(1):15. https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2019.00046

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma R, Sinha S, Danishad KA et al (2009) Investigation of hepatic gluconeogenesis pathway in non-diabetic Asian Indians with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using in vivo (31P) phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Atherosclerosis. 203(1):291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHEROSCLEROSIS.2008.06.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin TC, Lee HM, Seo HN et al (2018) Correlation between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hemoglobin A1c level in adult males without diabetes. Korean J Fam Pract. 8(1):131–135. https://doi.org/10.21215/KJFP.2018.8.1.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diabetes Trials Unit: HOMA Calculator News archive. Accessed July 26, 2021. http://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/generic/newsarchive.php?Study=91

  20. Gore RM, Levine MS. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology (NEED PHYSICAL COPY). Published online 2008. Accessed 26 Jul 2021. http://ucs.cirqahosting.com/HeritageScripts/Hapi.dll/retrieve2?SearchTerm0=001x000157079&Dispfmt=F

  21. Cai J, Zhang X-J, Li H (2019) Progress and challenges in the prevention and control of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Med Res Rev. 39(1):328–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/MED.21515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paschos P, Paletas K (2009) Non alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome. Hippokratia 13(1):9 Accessed 26 Jul 2021. /pmc/articles/PMC2633261/

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong CA, Araneta MRG, Barrett-Connor E, Alcaraz J, Castañeda D, Macera C (2008) Probable NAFLD, by ALT levels, and diabetes among Filipino-American Women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 79(1):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIABRES.2007.07.012

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klisic A, Kavaric N, Ninic A (2019) Predictive values of serum uric acid and alanine-aminotransferase for fatty liver index in Montenegrin population. J Med Biochem. 38(4):407. https://doi.org/10.2478/JOMB-2019-0001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. SM Al H, AA Al S, Mahfouz AA, Awadalla NJ, Musa MJ, Patel A (2020) Clinical and biochemical predictors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at primary health care level in South Western Saudi Arabia. Diagnostics 10:809. https://doi.org/10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS10100809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Önal Z, Atasayan V, Gürbüz T, Hepkaya E, Nuhoğlu C (2014) Association of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels with Iinsulin resistance in obese children. Afr Health Sci. 14(3):533–538. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v14i3.6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitade H, Chen G, Ni Y, Ota T (2017) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance: new insights and potential new treatments. Nutr 9:387. https://doi.org/10.3390/NU9040387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stephen S, Baranova A, Younossi ZM et al (2014) Nat Rev Dis Primers 6(2):163–171. https://doi.org/10.1586/EGH.11.97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bugianesi E, Gastaldelli A, Vanni E et al (2005) Insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: sites and mechanisms. Diabetol 48((4):634–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00125-005-1682-X

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu DS, Zhu SH, Li X et al (2019) Association between hemoglobin glycation index and NAFLD in Chinese nondiabetic individuals. Can. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8748459

  31. Bae JC, Cho YK, Lee WY et al (2010) Impact of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease on insulin resistance in relation to HbA1c levels in nondiabetic subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 105(11):2389–2395. https://doi.org/10.1038/AJG.2010.275

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. D’Adamo E, Giannini C, Chiavaroli V et al (2011) What is the significance of soluble and endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in liver steatosis in obese prepubertal children? Antioxid Redox Signal 14(6):1167–1172. https://doi.org/10.1089/ARS.2010.3719https://home.liebertpub.com/ars

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E et al (2008) Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. Hepatology. 48(3):792–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEP.22429

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Palma-Duran SA, Kontogianni MD, Vlassopoulos A et al (2018) Serum levels of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and the decoy soluble receptor for AGEs (sRAGE) can identify non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in age-, sex- and BMI-matched normo-glycemic adults. Metabolism. 83:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.METABOL.2018.01.023

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cantero I, Abete I, JM del B et al (2018) Changes in lysophospholipids and liver status after weight loss: the RESMENA study. Nutr Metab 15(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12986-018-0288-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Polsky S, Ellis SL (2015) Obesity, insulin resistance, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 22(4):277–282. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000170

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Speliotes EK, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U et al (2010) Fatty liver is associated with dyslipidemia and dysglycemia independent of visceral fat: the Framingham heart study. Hepatology. 51(6):1979–1987. https://doi.org/10.1002/HEP.23593

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Foster T, Anania FA, Li D, Ronit Katz, Budoff M. The prevalence and clinical correlates of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in African Americans: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2652-7

  39. Fukuda Y, Hashimoto Y, Hamaguchi M et al (2016) Triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is an independent predictor of incident fatty liver; a population-based cohort study. Liver Int. 36(5):713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/LIV.12977

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou M, Zhu L, Cui X et al (2016) The triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio as a predictor of insulin resistance but not of β cell function in a Chinese population with different glucose tolerance status. Lipids Heal Dis 15(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12944-016-0270-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lucero D, Miksztowicz V, Macri V et al (2015) Overproduction of altered VLDL in an insulin-resistance rat model: Influence of SREBP-1c and PPAR-α. Clín Invest Arterioscler. 27(4):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTERI.2014.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 17 Champollion Street, El Messallah, Alexandria, 21131, Egypt

    H. Naguib

  2. Internal Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    H. Kassab

Authors
  1. H. Naguib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Kassab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HN and HK have conceived and designed the study, participated in researching and analyzing data, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Naguib.

Ethics declarations

Competing of interests

The authors declare that they have no potential competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in alignment with revised Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Our study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University (IRB No. 0304901). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naguib, H., Kassab, H. Potential relation between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and glycemic and metabolic parameters in subjects without diabetes. Egypt Liver Journal 11, 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-021-00154-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-021-00154-z

Keywords

  • Insulin resistance
  • Triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein ratio
  • Glycosylated hemoglobin
  • Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease