Skip to main content
Egyptian Liver Journal
Download PDF

Survival benefits of adding simvastatin to standard therapy for secondary prevention of bleeding esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis

Egyptian Liver Journal volume 11, Article number: 76 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The combination of endoscopic band ligation and beta-blockers is the standard of care treatment for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding; however, rebleeding still occurs with associated high mortality. Simvastatin (a lipid-lowering agent) was found to reduce portal hypertension and decrease hepatic fibrosis. This study aimed to assess the effect of adding simvastatin to the standard therapy to prevent variceal rebleeding and its impact on survival in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Results

This single-center randomized controlled clinical trial included 80 patients with cirrhosis receiving the standard secondary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding composed of endoscopic variceal ligation and non-selective β-blockers (either propranolol or carvedilol). Two weeks after the first attack of hematemesis, patients were randomized into two groups: group I who received the standard therapy (40 patients) and group II who administered simvastatin (20 mg daily for 2 weeks and 40 mg daily after that). Patients were followed up for 1 year. The primary endpoints were rebleeding and overall survival. Thirty patients of group I completed the study while ten patients died during the follow-up period. The simvastatin group showed a significantly better overall 1-year survival (3 deaths during follow-up) compared to the control group (37/40, 92.5% vs. 30/40; 75%) (p-value 0.034); however, this was lacking in Child C patients. No similar difference was present in rebleeding rates between the two groups (5/40, 12.5% vs. 3/40, 7.5%) (p-value 0.456) in groups I and II, respectively.

Conclusions

Adding simvastatin to the standard therapy in secondary prevention of variceal bleeding could be associated with survival benefits in patients with Child A and B cirrhosis, while was incapable of reducing rebleeding.

Background

Liver cirrhosis is considered the most common cause of portal hypertension (PHT) [1]. Increased portal inflow and increased outflow resistance are associated with the development of PHT [2]. Liver transplantation is indicated in patients with advanced cirrhosis complicated by PHT; furthermore, morbidity and mortality are augmented in these patients [3, 4]. PHT management’s ideal drug should decrease portal pressure by lowering intrahepatic vascular resistance while maintaining or increasing hepatic blood flow [3]. Moreover, it should improve liver function through its antifibrotic effects, and it should be able to increase nitric oxide bioavailability in the liver to help fulfill many of these requirements [3, 5,6,7,8]. Currently, the available therapies for PHT are based on the use of β-adrenergic blockers, with or without organic nitrates, and allow achievement of the target hemodynamic response in less than half of patients.

Moreover, about 30% of patients may have contraindications or may not tolerate β-blockers [9]. Statins such as simvastatin are used mainly for cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome. They exert multiple pleiotropic effects and can be used safely in patients with chronic liver diseases [10]. Statins can have anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects in patients with liver cirrhosis through many proposed mechanisms [11,12,13,14]. Some reports showed survival benefits and improvement in liver profile with simvastatin use [14, 15]. Moreover, an improvement in PHT, reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence, and delays in hepatic decompensation have been associated with the use of statins in patients with liver cirrhosis [15, 16].

We aimed to assess the effect of adding simvastatin to the standard therapy used to prevent variceal rebleeding and to evaluate its impact on survival in patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis. Statins have a long history of being safe and tolerable medications. Because this family of drugs is generic and inexpensive, there will be few barriers to general acceptance of statins’ role in preventing bleeding in patients with esophageal varices if the theory is validated.

Methods

This prospective single-center randomized control study was conducted in the National Liver Institute Hospital, Menoufia, Egypt, between June 2017 and January 2019. The target population of this study was patients with cirrhosis as diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography and furtherly confirmed and stratified by the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP score), who recovered from the first attack of variceal bleeding. The sample size and power analysis were calculated using the Epi-Info software statistical package created by the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA, version 2002. The criteria used for sample size calculations were 95% confidence limit and 80% power of the study. The sample size was estimated as 40 subjects in each study group, with a total sample size of 80 participants.

Within 2 weeks of the index hematemesis episode, patients were randomized into two groups (by using closed envelops) that was previously generated with a specialized software:

Group 1 (control group) included 40 patients who received the standard secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding composed of endoscopic variceal band ligation and non-selective β-blockers (NSBB): either propranolol or carvedilol.

Group 2 included 40 patients who received simvastatin in addition to the previous standard secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Simvastatin was given in a dose of 20 mg daily for 2 weeks and 40 mg daily after that.

The inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 80 years, evidence of liver cirrhosis, and first attack of variceal bleeding within the previous 2 weeks. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation, hepatocellular carcinoma, creatinine above 2 mg/dL, CTP score > 13, contraindication for statins, previous portosystemic shunt, bleeding gastric varices, thrombosed portal vein or portal vein malformations, previous treatment with the standard of care prophylaxis (before the index episode), and previous exposure to statins within 1 month of randomization.

All recruited patients received the standard secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding (endoscopic variceal band ligation and NSBB). Medical prophylaxis (NSBB) started after a week of the index hematemesis episode, with either propranolol or carvedilol. Doses of NSBB were increased gradually to the maximum tolerated dose. After having the initial endoscopic band ligation session, scheduled endoscopic follow-up was arranged 2 to 4 weeks after and repeated until reporting variceal eradication. Patients were followed up regularly after 2 weeks of randomization; at months 3, 6, and 9; and at the end of the follow-up year. Other concomitant medications of the study patients were maintained during the follow-up period. Upper GI endoscopy was the standard gold method used in diagnosing and staging gastroesophageal varices (GOVs) (small varices < 5 mm and large varices > 5 mm).

Results

The current study included 80 patients with cirrhosis and PHT (40 in each group). Regarding the cause of cirrhosis, 77 patients were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive, two were hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive, and one had combined HCV and HBV infections. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding age, sex, clinical features, and medical history (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and diuretics therapy history). Baseline characteristics in both groups are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics in both groups
Full size table

Also, no significant difference was encountered in the CTP score between the two studied groups (Table 2). Also, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was present in baseline laboratory analysis (blood picture indices, liver and kidney function tests, INR). After having the initial endoscopic band ligation session, scheduled endoscopic follow-up was performed at 2–4 weeks after; at months 3, 6, and 9; and at the end of the follow-up year. Detailed follow-up results of the performed endoscopies are reported in Table 3.

Table 2 Comparison of the Child-Pugh score classification of the studied groups
Full size table
Table 3 Endoscopic finding of the two studied groups
Full size table

Statistically significant survival benefits were observed in the simvastatin group (37/40; 92.5%) as compared to the control group (30/40; 75.0%) (p-value = 0.034). Upon stratifying the patients according to CTP score, there was a significant difference in survival in patients with CTP A & B classes (p < 0.05), while no survival benefits were found in CTP class C patients, as shown in Fig. 1. All reported deaths in both groups were linked to events related to the existing liver disease including encephalopathy and bleeding episodes. Meanwhile, no significant difference was present in rebleeding rates between the two groups, as 5 cases in group 1 experienced bleeding attacks (12.5%), compared to 3 cases in group II (7.5%) (p-value 0.456). A highly significant difference was noted in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) between group I (15/40) and group II (0/40) (p < 0.05); however, this effect was not present in multivariate analysis (Table 4). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of adverse events during the study between the two groups as regards diarrhea (5% and 10%) and worsening of ascites (17.5% and 22.5%) in groups I and II, respectively; however, myalgia was more frequent in the simvastatin group (5% in group I and 20% in group II, p-value 0.043). Multivariate analysis was performed to test simvastatin’s effect and confirmed that only survival was affected and no statistical differences between the 2 groups in other factors like the presence of encephalopathy, myalgia, and Child score of the studied patients (Table 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Survival of the studied groups

Full size image
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the effect of simvastatin in improving the survival
Full size table

Discussion

In the current study, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of HE episodes in the simvastatin group (0/40), compared to the control group (15/40), and this is in accordance with the finding of studies which showed survival benefits and improvement in liver functions with simvastatin [14, 15]. Improvement in PHT, reduction in the incidence of HCC, and delays in hepatic decompensation have been associated with statin therapy among patients with cirrhosis [15, 16]. In our study, there was no significant difference between the two groups concerning INR, albumin level, total bilirubin, AST, and ALT, and this comes with an agreement with the findings in most of the studies discussing the impact of statins on the liver biochemical profile [17,18,19]. Statins are known to decrease Rho-kinase activity in activated hepatic stellate cells [11]. Besides, statins have anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant properties [12]. Simvastatin is also known to induce Krüppel-like factor 2, which improves liver fibrosis and PHT by increasing nitric oxide bioavailability [13, 14]. Generally, conflicting reports are available in the literature regarding liver function changes with statin use, with an insignificant risk of elevated transaminases [20, 21]. No significant difference was observed in the adverse effects noted during the study between the two groups in terms of diarrhea or worsening of ascites; however, there was a significant difference between the two study groups in myalgia, while other studies found no significant difference in adverse effect in the term of diarrhea, ascites, and myalgia noted during the study [17, 18]. Regarding the survival of patients in the two studied groups, there was a significant difference between them. This agrees with Motzkus-Feagans and his colleague [17] and agrees with a study done using the Veteran Affairs Clinical Case Registry [22]. This study described the effect of statins in cirrhotic HCV patients matched 1:5 with statin non-users, finding fewer decompensation episodes and death in statin users. No differences in comorbidities, metabolic conditions, or hepatic function were reported between the groups. The positive effect of statins in cirrhosis decompensation and mortality persisted at 10 years after adjustment for age, FIB-4 index score, serum level of albumin, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), and CTP scores [22]. In our study, no significant difference was observed between the two groups as regards variceal rebleeding. This also agrees with the finding of Motzkus-Feagans et al., who proved that rebleeding rates were not different between the treatment and the control [17].

Regarding survival in CTP score A and B patients, there was a significant difference between the two studied groups. At the same time, there was an increased survival in group II patients compared to group I. The same finding was conveyed by Motzkus-Feagans and his colleague, who reported an increased survival in decompensated cirrhotic patients who received simvastatin after variceal bleeding [17]. Similarly, Pollo-Flores and colleagues reported the same findings after evaluating statin use in cirrhotic patients to look for increased mortality or decompensation with a mean follow-up of 36 months, including most cirrhotic patients at an early stage (CTP score A) [23]. They show that statin use was associated with lower mortality and fewer hepatic decompensation episodes in multivariate analysis.

More prolonged administration of simvastatin treatment than placebo for severe PHT was assessed in a blinded randomized controlled trial. Three months of 40 mg simvastatin in 24 patients, most CTP A and B nearly two-thirds with use of NSBB and medium/ large esophageal varices including 30% with previous variceal bleeding, showed a significant reduction in HVPG with greater effect in patients with previous variceal bleeding and medium/large esophageal varices. Again, no significant increase in adverse events from the use of simvastatin was reported [23]. Regarding survival in Child C patients, no significant difference was observed between the two studied groups, which matches the published data in this regard [17].

The current study has some limitations, such as the relatively small sample size, which could be attributed to our narrow inclusion criteria and the long-term follow-up required for the participants. Repeating the experiment with a larger sized sample could confirm our findings.

Conclusions

Adding simvastatin to the standard therapy in secondary prevention of variceal bleeding could be associated with survival benefits in patients with Child A and B cirrhosis, while it was incapable of reducing rebleeding. Further studies are required to confirm this survival benefit.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CTP score:

Child-turcotte-pugh score

GOVs:

Gastroesophageal varices

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver disease

NSBB:

Non-selective β-blockers

PHT:

Portal hypertension

References

  1. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, García-Pagan JC (2009) The clinical use of HVPG measurements in chronic liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6(10):573–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2009.149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Groszmann R (2003) Current management of portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 38(Suppl 1):S54–S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00430-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vargas V, Rimola A, Casanovas T, Castells L, Navasa M, Baliellas C, Bilbao I, Visa J, Jaurrieta E, Margarit C (2003) Applicability of liver transplantation in Catalonia at the end of the millennium. A prospective study of adult patient selection for liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 16(4):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2003.tb00298.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Failli P, DeFranco RM, Caligiuri A et al (2000) Nitrovasodilators inhibit platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation and migration of activated human hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology. 119(2):479–492. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2000.9354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. García-Calderó H, Rodríguez-Vilarrupla A, Gracia-Sancho J, Diví M, Laviña B, Bosch J, García-Pagán JC (2011) Tempol administration, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, reduces hepatic vascular resistance and portal pressure in cirrhotic rats. J Hepatol. 54(4):660–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morales-Ruiz M (2003) Cejudo-martı́n P, Fernández-Varo G, et al. Transduction of the liver with activated Akt normalizes portal pressure in cirrhotic rats. Gastroenterology. 125(2):522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00909-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Franchis R (2005) Evolving consensus in portal hypertension report of the Baveno IV Consensus Workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 43(1):167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2005.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blum A, Shamburek R (2009) The pleiotropic effects of statins on endothelial function, vascular inflammation, immunomodulation and thrombogenesis. Atherosclerosis. 203(2):325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.08.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trebicka J, Hennenberg M, Laleman W, Shelest N, Biecker E, Schepke M, Nevens F, Sauerbruch T, Heller J (2007) Atorvastatin lowers portal pressure in cirrhotic rats by inhibition of RhoA/Rho-kinase and activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Hepatology. 46(1):242–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Violi F, Calvieri C, Ferro D, Pignatelli P (2013) Statins as antithrombotic drugs. Circulation. 127(2):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.145334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zafra C, Abraldes JG, Turnes J, Berzigotti A, Fernández M, Garcı́a-Pagán JC, Rodés J, Bosch J (2004) Simvastatin enhances hepatic nitric oxide production and decreases the hepatic vascular tone in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 126(3):749–755. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Pagan J-C, Villanueva C, Albillos A, Banares R, Morillas R, Abraldes JG, Bosch J, on behalf of the Spanish Variceal Bleeding Study Group (2009) Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate alone or associated with band ligation in the prevention of recurrent bleeding: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut. 58(8):1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.171207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerbruch T, Mengel M, Dollinger M et al (2015) Prevention of rebleeding from esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis receiving small-diameter stents versus hemodynamically controlled medical therapy. Gastroenterology 149(3):660–8. e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abraldes JG, Bureau C, Stefanescu H, Augustin S, Ney M, Blasco H, Procopet B, Bosch J, Genesca J, Berzigotti A, for the Anticipate Investigators (2016) Noninvasive tools and risk of clinically significant portal hypertension and varices in compensated cirrhosis: the “Anticipate” study. Hepatology. 64(6):2173–2184. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh S, Singh PP, Singh AG, Murad MH, Sanchez W (2013) Statins are associated with a reduced risk of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 144(2):323–332. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elwan N, Salah R, Hamisa M et al (2018) Evaluation of portal pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis before and after simvastatin administration–a randomized controlled trial. F1000Research. 7:256. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13915.1

  17. Motzkus-Feagans C, Pakyz A, Ratliff S et al (2013) Statin use and infections in Veterans with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 38(6):611–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schuppan D, Afdhal NH (2008) Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 371(9615):838–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60383-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bays H, Cohen DE, Chalasani N, Harrison SA (2014) An assessment by the statin liver safety task force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 8(3):S47–S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2014.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Russo MW, Hoofnagle JH, Gu J, Fontana RJ, Barnhart H, Kleiner DE, Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL (2014) Spectrum of statin hepatotoxicity: experience of the drug-induced liver injury network. Hepatology. 60(2):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohanty A, Tate JP, Garcia-Tsao G (2016) Statins are associated with a decreased risk of decompensation and death in veterans with hepatitis C–related compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 150(2):430–40. e1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar S, Grace ND, Qamar AA (2014) Statin use in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study. Dig Dis Sci. 59(8):1958–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3179-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pollo-Flores P, Soldan M, Santos UC, Kunz DG, Mattos DE, da Silva AC, Marchiori RC, Rezende GFM (2015) Three months of simvastatin therapy vs. placebo for severe portal hypertension in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 47(11):957–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2015.07.156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

This is a non-funded work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hepatology and Gastroenterology Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

    Helmy Elshazly, Hasan Zaghlah, El-Sayed Tharwa & Ahmed Abuamer

  2. Tanta Fever Hospital, Tanta, Gharbiah, Egypt

    Dina Nor-Eldin

  3. Tropical Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt

    Reem El Sheemy

  4. Endemic Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Ain Helwan, Cairo, 11795, Egypt

    Mohamed El Kassas

Authors
  1. Helmy Elshazly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hasan Zaghlah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. El-Sayed Tharwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed Abuamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dina Nor-Eldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Reem El Sheemy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mohamed El Kassas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was designed by HE, HA, and EST. AA and DNE collected the study data and oversaw the participant visits. MEK and RE provided regulatory oversight. DNE, RE, and MEK wrote the first draft of the article. All authors contributed to the reviewing and editing of the article and approved the final version. Article preparation was done by all study authors, and the decision to submit the article for publication was made by all the study authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed El Kassas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were following the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) for human subject research at the National Liver Institute in 2017. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to the journal rules for publications.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elshazly, H., Zaghlah, H., Tharwa, ES. et al. Survival benefits of adding simvastatin to standard therapy for secondary prevention of bleeding esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis. Egypt Liver Journal 11, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-021-00143-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-021-00143-2

Keywords

  • Bleeding varices
  • Beta-blockers
  • Egypt
  • Hematemesis
  • Cirrhosis
  • Secondary prevention
  • Simvastatin
  • Statins
  • Portal hypertension
  • Prophylaxis