Skip to main content

Table 3 Distribution of genotype and allele frequencies and association of single SNPs within the BDNF gene with liver cirrhosis in heavy drinkers

From: Relationship between BDNF gene polymorphisms and alcohol-related liver cirrhosis

SNP

Genotypes

AUD, n = 71

ALC, n = 110

Ļ‡2 (p value)

OR (95% CI), p value

rs925946

GG, n (%)

GT, n (%)

TT, n (%)

Dominant model

GG, n (%)

GT+TT, n (%)

Recessive model

GG+GT, n (%)

TT, n (%)

G allele, n (%)

T allele, n (%)

45 (63.4)

24 (33.8)

2 (2.8)

45 (63.4)

26 (36.6)

69 (97.2)

2 (2.8)

114 (80.3)

28 (19.7)

62 (56.4)

36 (32.7)

12 (10.9)

62 (56.4)

48 (43.6)

98 (89.1)

12 (10.9)

160 (72.7)

60 (27.3)

0.009 (0.924)

2.935 (0.087)

0.613 (0.434)

2.907 (0.088)

2.282 (0.131)

1

0.984 (0.480ā€“2.019), 0.966

6.287 (1.286ā€“30.738), 0.023

1

1.366 (0.700ā€“2.665), 0.360

1

6.321 (1.317ā€“30.348), 0.021

rs6265

GG, n (%)

GA, n (%)

AA, n (%)

Dominant model

GG, n (%)

GA+AA, n (%)

Recessive model

GG+GA

AA, n (%)

G allele, n (%)

A allele, n (%)

52 (73.2)

16 (22.5)

3 (4.2)

52 (73.2)

19 (26.8)

68 (95.8)

3 (4.2)

120 (84.5)

22 (15.5)

80 (72.7)

29 (26.4)

1 (0.9)

80 (72.7)

30 (27.3)

109 (99.1)

1 (0.9)

189 (85.9)

31 (14.1)

0.078 (0.780)

0.833 (0.361)

0.009 (0.924)

0.929 (0.335)

0.047 (0.829)

1

0.182 (0.014ā€“2.354), 0.192

0.947 (0.435ā€“2.063), 0.891

1

0.828 (0.392ā€“1.750), 0.620

1

0.184 (0.014ā€“2.365), 0.194

rs10835210

CC, n (%)

CA, n (%)

AA, n (%)

Dominant model

CC, n (%)

CA+AA, n (%)

Recessive model

CC+CA

AA, n (%)

C allele, n (%)

A allele, n (%)

12 (16.9)

33 (46.5)

26 (36.6)

12 (16.9)

59 (83.1)

45 (63.4)

26 (36.6)

57 (40.1)

85 (59.9)

29 (26.4)

48 (43.6)

33 (30.0)

29 (26.4)

81 (73.6)

77 (70.0)

33 (30.0)

106 (48.2)

114 (51.8)

1.086 (0.297)

1.665 (0.197)

1.698 (0.193)

0.586 (0.444)

1.941 (0.164)

10.595 (0.249ā€“1.421), 0.243

0.570 (0.202ā€“1.269), 0.147

1

0.556 (0.247ā€“1.251), 0.156

1

0.721 (0.360ā€“1.442), 0.355

rs7103411

TT, n (%)

TC, n (%)

CC, n (%)

Dominant model

TT, n (%)

TC+CC, n (%)

Recessive model

TT+TC

CC, n (%)

T allele, n (%)

C allele, n (%)

49 (69.0)

22 (31.0)

0 (0.0)

49 (69.0)

22 (31.0)

71 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

120 (84.5)

22 (15.5)

75 (68.2)

35 (31.8)

0 (0.0)

75 (68.2)

35 (31.8)

110 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

185 (84.1)

35 (15.9)

0.002 (0.963)

ā€“ā€“ā€“

0.002 (0.963)

ā€“ā€“ā€“

0.002 (0.967)

1

0.892 (0.439ā€“1.814), 0.752

ā€“ā€“ā€“

1

0.892 (0.439ā€“1.814), 0.752

ā€“ā€“ā€“

rs75945125

TT, n (%)

TC, n (%)

CC, n (%)

Dominant model

TT, n (%)

TC+CC, n (%)

Recessive model

TT+TC

CC, n (%)

T allele, n (%)

C allele, n (%)

65 (91.5)

6 (8.5)

0 (0.0)

65 (91.5)

6 (8.5)

71 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

136 (95.8)

6 (4.2)

98 (89.1)

12 (10.9)

0 (0.0)

98 (89.1)

12 (10.9)

110 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

208 (94.5)

12 (5.5)

0.081 (0.775)

ā€“ā€“ā€“

0.081 (0.775)

ā€“ā€“ā€“

0.077 (0.781)

1

1.368 (0.451ā€“4.151), 0.581

1

1.368 (0.451ā€“4.151), 0.581

ā€“ā€“ā€“

  1. Ļ‡2 values were established by using contingency tables. Logistic regression analysis with the presence of encephalopathy and diabetes as covariates was used to calculate ORs. Statistically significant values are in bold italic
  2. Abbreviations: BDNFĀ brain-derived neurotrophic factor, SNPĀ single nucleotide polymorphism,Ā AUDĀ alcohol use disorder, ALCĀ alcohol-related liver cirrhosis, ORĀ odds ratio, CIĀ confidence interval