|
Are you familiar with radiological methods for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis? %
|
|
Very familiar
|
58.12
|
|
Familiar
|
37.30
|
|
Not familiar
|
4.58
|
|
Do you think radiological methods are reliable for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis? %
|
|
Extremely likely (100%)
|
10.89
|
|
Very likely (75%)
|
51.20
|
|
Moderately likely (50%)
|
32.90
|
|
Slightly likely (25%)
|
4.58
|
|
Not at all likely (0%)
|
0.44
|
|
Do you think radiological methods for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis are acceptable by patients? %
|
|
Extremely likely (100%)
|
51.20
|
|
Very likely (75%)
|
37.90
|
|
Moderately likely (50%)
|
8.71
|
|
Slightly likely (25%)
|
1.74
|
|
Not at all likely (0%)
|
0.44
|
|
Do you think radiological methods for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis are easily applicable in clinical practice? %
|
|
Extremely likely (100%)
|
32.68
|
|
Very likely (75%)
|
45.1
|
|
Moderately likely (50%)
|
18.52
|
|
Slightly likely (25%)
|
3.27
|
|
Not at all likely (0%)
|
0.44
|
|
Which radiological methods do you use for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis? “Please choose all that apply" %
|
|
Ultrasound
|
59.48
|
|
Computed tomography
|
26.58
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging
|
24.62
|
|
FibroScan
|
85.40
|
|
Ultrasound based elastography
|
25.05
|
|
MRI-based elastography
|
8.71
|
|
What are the limitations of using radiological methods for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis? Please choose all that apply %
|
|
Cost
|
47.06
|
|
Exposure to radiation
|
14.38
|
|
Availability
|
60.13
|
|
Accuracy
|
45.53
|
|
I don’t trust non-invasive methods
|
0.22
|
|
What is encouraging you for using radiological methods for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis? Please choose all that apply %
|
|
Easy to use
|
87.58
|
|
Less costly than liver biopsy
|
41.61
|
|
Not convinced that liver biopsy is the gold standard
|
15.03
|
|
Patient refusal for liver biopsy
|
64.27
|
