Skip to main content

Table 1 Hepatologists’ attitude towards the use of liver biopsy for diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis

From: Role of liver biopsy versus non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis: a web-based survey

Variable

Patients (n = 573)

Do you think the liver biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosing liver fibrosis? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

21.15

 Very likely (75%)

39.92

 Moderately likely (50%)

23.91

 Slightly likely (25%)

11.07

 Not at all likely (0%)

3.95

In your practice what percentage of patients accept liver biopsy? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

6.13

 Very likely (75%)

37.55

 Moderately likely (50%)

32.81

 Slightly likely (25%)

22.53

 Not at all likely (0%)

1.98

Do you think we still need a liver biopsy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in viral hepatitis? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

4.35

 Very likely (75%)

13.64

 Moderately likely (50%)

26.88

 Slightly likely (25%)

37.94

 Not at all likely (0%)

18.18

Do you think we still need a liver biopsy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in non-viral chronic liver diseases? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

10.67

 Very likely (75%)

34.39

 Moderately likely (50%)

27.67

 Slightly likely (25%)

20.55

 Not at all likely (0%)

7.11

How frequently do you see discordant results of liver biopsy histopathology reports with clinical findings? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

0.99

 Very likely (75%)

6.52

 Moderately likely (50%)

30.24

 Slightly likely (25%)

59.68

 Not at all likely (0%)

2.57

What do you do if the histopathology report is discordant with clinical findings? %

 Ask for a second opinion from another pathologist

34.19

 Repeat liver biopsy

6.72

 Use non-invasive methods “biomarkers”

19.57

 Use non-invasive methods “Radiological”

39.53

Do you think that currently used histopathological scoring systems are satisfactory for clinical decisions? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

9.29

 Very likely (75%)

59.88

 Moderately likely (50%)

25.30

 Slightly likely (25%)

4.94

 Not at all likely (0%)

0.59

Do you diagnose cirrhosis easily? %

 Yes

88.45

 No

11.55

How do you diagnose cirrhosis? “choose all that apply” %

 Clinically

51.58

 Laboratory tests

50

 Radiological methods

53.95

 All of the above

62.85

Do you diagnose significant fibrosis easily? %

 Yes

51.58

 No

48.42

How do you diagnose significant fibrosis? “choose all that apply” %

 Clinically

22.92

 Laboratory tests

34.19

 Radiological methods

44.66

 All of the above

38.93

Do you think a liver biopsy is required for diagnosing cirrhosis? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

2.77

 Very likely (75%)

8.50

 Moderately likely (50%)

21.94

 Slightly likely (25%)

45.45

 Not at all likely (0%)

21.34

Do you think we need a more practical alternative to liver biopsy to assess liver disease progression or response to treatment? %

 Extremely likely (100%)

47.83

 Very likely (75%)

36.17

 Moderately likely (50%)

10.08

 Slightly likely (25%)

4.15

 Not at all likely (0%)

1.78