Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation and regression between steatosis grades by CAP and different non-invasive parameters for liver steatosis

From: Assessment of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis by vibration-controlled transient elastography and controlled attenuation parameter versus non-invasive assessment scores in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Relations

Correlation and regression

P value

FLI

Steatosis value

r = 0.26

0.012

Steatosis grade

r = 0.44

0.0001

Regression

Steatosis value = 251.005 + 2.006 (FLI)

0.012

BMI

Steatosis value

r = 0.54

0.028

Steatosis grade

r = 0.59

0.004

Regression

Steatosis value = 246.676 + 0.447 (BMI)

0.019

WC

Steatosis value

r = 0.62

0.036

Steatosis grade

r = 0.59

0.024

Regression

Steatosis value = 222.269 + 0.369 (WC)

0.003

ALT

Steatosis value

r = 0.56

0.0001

Steatosis grade

r = 0.57

0.0001

Regression

Steatosis value = 188.947 + 2.445 (ALT)

0.0001

AST

Steatosis value

r = 0.50

0.0001

Steatosis grade

r = 0.52

0.0001

Regression

Steatosis value = 184.903 + 2.488 (AST)

0.0001

GGT

Steatosis value

r = 0.58

0.0001

Steatosis grade

r = 0.56

0.0001

Regression

Steatosis value = 218.29 + 0.46 (GGT)

0.0001

TG

Steatosis value

r = 0.56

0.0001

Steatosis grade

r = 0.58

0.0001

Regression

Steatosis value = 205.268 + 0.357 (TG)

0.0001

Serum cholesterol

Steatosis value

r = 0.64

0.0001

Steatosis grade

r = 0.78

0.0001

Regression

Steatosis value = 114.586 + 0.721 (cholesterol)

0.0001

DM

Steatosis value

r = 0.46

0.026

Steatosis grade

r = 0.49

0.002

Regression

Steatosis value = 257.766 + 10.118 (diabetes or not)

0.041