Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation and regression between steatosis grades by CAP and different non-invasive parameters for liver steatosis

From: Assessment of hepatic fibrosis and steatosis by vibration-controlled transient elastography and controlled attenuation parameter versus non-invasive assessment scores in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Relations Correlation and regression P value
FLI Steatosis value r = 0.26 0.012
Steatosis grade r = 0.44 0.0001
Regression Steatosis value = 251.005 + 2.006 (FLI) 0.012
BMI Steatosis value r = 0.54 0.028
Steatosis grade r = 0.59 0.004
Regression Steatosis value = 246.676 + 0.447 (BMI) 0.019
WC Steatosis value r = 0.62 0.036
Steatosis grade r = 0.59 0.024
Regression Steatosis value = 222.269 + 0.369 (WC) 0.003
ALT Steatosis value r = 0.56 0.0001
Steatosis grade r = 0.57 0.0001
Regression Steatosis value = 188.947 + 2.445 (ALT) 0.0001
AST Steatosis value r = 0.50 0.0001
Steatosis grade r = 0.52 0.0001
Regression Steatosis value = 184.903 + 2.488 (AST) 0.0001
GGT Steatosis value r = 0.58 0.0001
Steatosis grade r = 0.56 0.0001
Regression Steatosis value = 218.29 + 0.46 (GGT) 0.0001
TG Steatosis value r = 0.56 0.0001
Steatosis grade r = 0.58 0.0001
Regression Steatosis value = 205.268 + 0.357 (TG) 0.0001
Serum cholesterol Steatosis value r = 0.64 0.0001
Steatosis grade r = 0.78 0.0001
Regression Steatosis value = 114.586 + 0.721 (cholesterol) 0.0001
DM Steatosis value r = 0.46 0.026
Steatosis grade r = 0.49 0.002
Regression Steatosis value = 257.766 + 10.118 (diabetes or not) 0.041